Call it premonition or something else, I had a feeling last week that a disturbance in the valley is nearing. What was the tell? J.D. Vance’s visit to India.
As far back as I can remember, Pakistan and its proxies have created nuisance whenever a foreign dignitary, especially a U.S. one is visiting India. I find it hard to believe that our security and intelligence establishments had not anticipated a disturbance coinciding with the U.S. Vice President’s visit. However, I also find it comical when people and politicians start blaming intelligence agencies for a failure to detect such occurrences. Every year, the police and intelligence apparatus thwarts countless attempts by mischievous actors at domestic and international level. But they cannot be expected to be omnipresent, and the resulting tragedies are anybody’s fault but theirs.
The Pahalgam Attack though is another low in a series of lows for the Pakistani state-sponsored terrorist organisations, and a stark reminder of the dangers of religious extremism that continues to plague the sub-continent.
Pakistan, despite losing more and more soldiers every year to the militant activities of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), continues to dabble with communal forces in hopes of destabilising the Kashmir Valley. On the other hand, India, once again has downgraded the already paltry engagement it had with the Pakistani establishment. The “no talks with terrorism on the table” approach by the Modi government has worked and not worked at the same time. At the diplomatic level, we no longer have to engage in bogus efforts at peace with the Pakistanis and a permanent sense of enmity has persisted since Pulwama and the abrogation of the Article 370. But then, in face of attacks like Pulwama and now Pahalgam, our military options remain limited, which in turn emboldens organisations like Lashkar-e-Taiba to strike us time and again. Despite the political narrative, our last attempt at gung-ho counteraction resulted in the capture of Group Captain Abhinandan Vardhaman. So, the state of play does not favour us overwhelmingly when it comes to direct action against any of our neighbours and near adversaries.
Finding and punishing the culprits of the attack is the near term goal. But that too remains a challenge due to the porous nature of the Line of Control. The BJP government, which runs a parallel social media arm, is under pressure from its more extreme and emotional audience to act, and act fast. A five point action plan has already been published, leading with the abeyance of the Indus Waters Treaty. But Can India turn off Indus tap and leave Pakistan high and dry? Not for some years. At present we do not have the infrastructure needed to slow or divert the waters of Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab. But at policy planning level, it will surely worry the Pakistanis, who are almost always under financial duress.
A sweep of the Valley is underway and we are hearing news of ongoing and concluded terrorist encounters, with one more brave soul martyred on the Indian side. Sketches of the perpetrators have also been released by the security establishment and the hunt is on. Other than that, surgical action against targets on the other side of LoC is an option, but apart from creating media headlines its effectiveness remains questionable.
In my opinion, it’s about time that we invest more in our cross border intelligence gathering and counterterrorism organisations. So the next time terrorism strikes, we are able to respond quickly and decisively against cross-border elements, and ensure that they know the price of such escalations. But these efforts must be disciplined and discreet—not half-baked blunders like the Hardeep Singh Nijjar episode, which backfired diplomatically and strained ties with our Quad allies.
We do appreciate comments from the audience and will try to publish the good ones and the especially nasty ones. No middle ground there - so, don't be the minimum guy or gal, or them-their whatever.
Pen name, Atomsingh Bishnoi, is an avid reader of all things, tech, gaming, high-fantasy, and politics. Consuming an average of 5000 words a day, he has developed insights that are found nowhere else on the internet, except on sites that are backlinked, hah!